Obviously articles like that are having a hell of a lot more weight (negative) on the stock price than anything CUU or Teck have released. I don't agree that keeping our heads in the sand is the best option. CUU or better yet Teck should respond to the article with their own factual view of the project. They owe it to themselves and shareholders to keep all project information accurate and up to date. Thats why the PR staff get the big nice salaries isn't it?

glta