First off, let me say that I respect the "not always so fun" responsibility that is put on hub leaders, you guys sometimes become the scape goats for others frustration. We must all remember that you are not on Agoracoms payroll but rather just volunteers trying to make a difference.

Some investors here know very well that this was probably not the best place to have put their money especially those in the upper $1.00-$2.00 area, but remember you as individuals pressed the purchase order and now you have to live with it.

One thing, however, I would like to question is the following comment: The original post on "Federal gov't support" was borderline Off-topic and probably should be removed

This is where Agoracom must pay more attention to make the rules clear for everyone. A post can't be borderline Off-topic, my response to that is your either pregnant or your not there is no ambiguous inbetween and the same should be followed here. There should be a clear line between on or off topic and that is up to Agoracam to properly define and not up to the hub leaders to have to use their judgement or make interpretations.

A little on CUU and Schaft Creek now, in their annual results yesterday, a specific line caught my attention:

Management of the Joint Venture consists of two representatives each from Teck and Copper Fox with voting proportional to equity interests. Does this actually mean that in the end, we only get 25% say on how this whole story will develop?

glta