I totaly agree with you d_man_123, I actually find it encouraging to remember the preliminary feasiblity study numbers. Yes, I agree that the full FS was a poor follow up to the PFS. However it shows that kind of improvements that we can expect (hope for) when they do the project enhancements. It shows the potential net affect of the enhancements.

What I find encouraging is that the PFS used such low metal prices ($3.12/pound copper, $692/oz gold, $33.00/pound molybdenum and $13.09/ozs silver) - and yet they still had a negative $0.32 costs to produce pound of copper net of the sale of the gold-molybdenum-silver credits. I had totally forgotten that.