Re: agenda
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 20, 2014 04:21PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
I think the majority of the negative chatter comes from former posters here who were Banned over the years. If they feel they were wrongly banned they will use other forums that are more 'forgiving' to lash out and voice their frustrations at whatever and whomever. Just like an employee who feels he was wrongly fired from his job, will often lash out at the former employer and even former co-workers.
There has been dozens and dozens and dozens of posters here who've been banned, and many were supportive of the stock up to a certain point before they got frustrated. I can't think of any other Agoracom forum that has banned more people than this one. I think there is a very solid connection between the ongoing negative chatter and the bannings here. Just my .02.
As for the "agenda", I do like to talk about the pros and cons of CUU and SC. Such as what would happen if copper prices fall? what happens if it goes to $4 again?
HOWEVER, if you consistently say negatives of CUU without anything to back it, you're basically bashing this stock. Yet a lot of these posters are basically trying to save us from losing anymore money, they spend all their time and effort on their crusade to prevent anyone of us to invest further into this company.
+1 for notsoquicks post