Carmax pays $6000 a year as a 'sponsorship', and the article mentioned nothing but positive info...

For example:

------------------------------

You start with:

“The Inferred Mineral Resource estimate totals 102.5 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.29% Cu, 0.010% Mo, and 0.08 g/t Au. The resources were estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.16% copper equivalent ("CuEq") and contain approximately 662 million pounds copper, 22 million pounds molybdenum, and 265,000 ounces gold.”

Then later states:

One word, POTENTIAL!

Let's get to that potential - how does 2 to 4 billion tonnes sound to you?

-----------------------------------

So how exactly do you get from .1 billion tonnes to 2 to 4 billion?

Sure, 2 - 4 billion sounds pretty good, but we have 0.1

Also, mineable grades are under 1/3 km deep overburden.

Open at depth - just like Schaft Creek - pit mining can't reach the best stuff.

Oh, and almost no cash left.

Don't forget, controlling share recently sold for a couple million.

If you think any part of this article holds water, please show me where?

Or do you want to cling to anything positive - regardless of what logic states?

I never commented on the Seeking Alpha article as there was enough already pulling it apart. I never said I thought it was an honest representation of things either. I think there was both positive and negative in the article as far as I remember anyways, but definately a negative slant.