I don't see why what I recommend on another site is on topic here, but I DO stand behind every post and rec I make.

I'm not hiding anything. I am not set in my position and am open to discussion both positive or negative. Really, it is just discussion - its not like we are "team Elmer" or "team Meta". I want to look deeper at the risks as that is where I feel we are sitting right now. I want to hear both sides of the story and vette out what is reasonable ot assume vs what isn't. What is wrong with that?

Everyone is all about trying to label people here - I'm not sure why?

I welcome anyone to go over to SI and check out the board. There is a lot of good discussion with some well supported posts (some not too). No censoring - everyone has an equal opportunity to post without being 'moderated'.

What exactly did you see that I recommended that was so interesting? If you want me to justify why I did any of them, choose one and I'll explain it here in detail.

I don't know if anyone else wants me to do that, but if you ask...