Re: Teck slashes dividend...
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 21, 2015 03:07PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Shows the opinion of Teck and what they see in Schaft Creek. If it was so bad, why spend even the $20 million for the JV, then $3 million for for year study and then another $5 million this year.
============================
I agree with you, Teck definately wants it and wants to sort everything out so they have a clear view of what the asset has to offer them.
I would suggest that the biggest stumbling block for us right now is the CAPEX costs. I'm sure SC will be one of their richest and lowest cost/lb properties. But its a BIG spend to get it operational and won't start paying back for several years.
I believe that is the reason they want to buy a distressed copper producer - lower spend and production can pay back as soon as metal prices move. I think with market conditions (both market and metals) they are focusing on the near term, at least that what it looks like to me.
I think after their bottom line strengthens - they will be ready to move quickly on us and they will know all they need to know about SC.
I don't discount that this could happen much sooner and they could move on us later this year. There are good arguments for that scenario too, but for me personally I think their next copper move will be a producer as per thier public statements, IMHO.
Still no office response re: VD and water rights at this point.