posted on
Jul 25, 2012 01:34PM
Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Message: Re: NDP
The pine beetle didn't sneak up on us. It was imported during the war from boxes used to ship stuff back. What they did was stall the cut and destroy the forest industry which allowed the trees to rot. The USA had a lot to do with that too. Mining was hit hard and a lot of the money just walked away. Not to say it was a complete halt. Farming was hard hit as the infastructure came under attack and trucking costs and other supports dwindled. Even fishing came under attack. Illegal salmon were at an all time high. The underground economy came alive as people were forced into it due to losses of income and purchase power. Tax dollars were squandered and stolen and the gov't continued the gross mismanagement of the coffers. While this was going on unions were strong arming companies who were stuck here and smaller non-union shops couldn't get work. Remember the legislation changes that gave control to unions?
But, this is all history. The NDP according to a number of posters here is all pro business. You can see that in the constitution statement that the party is formed on. This includes their huge support for the pipe line: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/04/30/bc-ndp-enbridge-pipeline.html
You can also see how business is a huge supporter of the NDP: http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/07/03/NDP-Business/ and more support here:
Mr. Dix, who was chief of staff in the late 1990s to former premier Glen Clark, was fired after forging a memo to cover for his boss amid a casino kickback scandal. Although he was fired, he still received a $70,000 severance package. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/business-group-intensifies-attacks-on-bc-ndp-leader/article534744/
And just to be clear where they stand:
The difficulty with an NDP government is that what you see is not what you get. The party, by virtue of its constitution, has a 19-century anti-business bias and is governed by too many non-elected factions. In terms of its socialist bent, consider the following from the B.C. NDP Constitution. “The New Democratic Party believes that social, economic and political progress can only be assured by the application of democratic socialist principles to government and the administration of public affairs. The principles of democratic socialism can be defined briefly as follows: a) the production of goods and services shall be directed to meeting the social and individual needs of people and not for profit. “ More troublesome is the intrusive roll the NDP executive plays in the roll of governing. Not a particular problem when the NDP is in opposition, but with an NDP government the policy apparatus is disturbingly invasive. Party procedure dictates that NDP MLAs bring questions of political clarity, applicability or feasibility to the NDP Provincial Council for decision. The Provincial Council is accountable to only to the party and is composed of labour representatives and other special-interest organizations. As a recent example, in 2007, former NDP leader Carole James had to get direction from the NDP Provincial Council on how NDP MLAs should vote on removal of Tsawwassen farm land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. Socialist economic policies and the constitutional dictate requiring elected MLAs to go cap in hand and toady up to a non-elected board of governors for guidance have no place in a modern democracy.
Now don't blame me for reporting the news. This is the face of the NDP and it is their track record. If you still think they are pro business and wo't twist a company's arm for bribe money think again.
Just for a lark, show us some headlines demonstrating the successes of the NDP from any term they had in office! Soon you will realize that it's not the party so much as it's the people in it. Sask did very well under the NDP.
Looking at those invasive party practices it is easy to see why the NDP has consistently performed so poorly when in government. During the 10 years of the last NDP government - 1991 to 2001 - unemployment in B.C. increased to double digits and as a province we suffered multiple credit-rating downgrades. Thanks to the NDP government and its interventionist policies, B.C. became a poor place to do business. Investors were leaving the province in droves. In 1999, Finning Tractor - a B.C. company since its inception in 1933 - moved it head offices to Edmonton. With the North American economy on a rip, B.C. trailed every Canadian jurisdiction in investment activity.
Although there is no doubt the current government is in trouble, so is the province if the NDP are elected as government. On three occasions, 1972, 1991 and 1996 the New Democrats formed government and in every case those terms ended in disaster.
2 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply