Why would RM relate any knowledge of a proposed merger anyway and be flooded with calls from shareholders when he has refused calls until further notice, in the past ? Wouldn't he remain closed-mouthed and let Roy take the heat for more rumours, even if Roy's article was in good faith? Roy certainly hasn't helped his cause lately. Why would Roy give more credence to naysayers about his intent and reputation, without some concrete info? If anyone knows where R. F. was over the weekend, it might be beneficial to know if Roy's articles have any substance.