Actually, your view on "assurances" is inaccurate.

True, Crystallex stated that VZ officials viewed the partnership favorably. Crystallex also stated all releases must be approved by CRRC management.

Logically, Crystallex would not put these statements in writing about Chinese Vice Premiers speaking to and receiving "assurances" from VZ officials if it were not true. (Presentation material)

Have you seen any published statements from Chinese Government officials disputing Crystallex' statements? Of course you haven't because the statements are true and accurate.

If they weren't true why did CRRC management sign the Binding Primary Agreement?