In any event, we would not need, nor could anyone force testimony from the Chinese. They would also not volunteer it, as they have other interests to consider.

Bottom line, the comments on the Chinese are the usual shareholder ranting and have no legal significance in our case.

NoBear...in my last telephone converstaion with Fung, he volunteered that his friends (his words) at the CRRC would testify for KRY at the arbitraation hearing. Not sure why he volunteered this information unless he felt it would be helpful or has no clue how the arbitration process works.