LK Asks: Agree?
I agree that realistic DD vs. Crystallex claims are very different.

LK had asked: Is this your post and if so, do you believe it to be true today?
LK then Asks: So why do you continue this silly debate?
Clue - See JackJack about re-posting my half-year old post.
Asking me to reply, then pointing blame with the "continue" question?
Should have seen it coming. Creds on the devious bait-and-switch.

LK Asks: Is it your goal to to prove that you may be more right than those that still have hope?
Really nothing to do with who is wrong or right. Nothing wrong with Hope.
Realistic verifiable stock DD information exchange is always key.
What is your goal?

LK Stated: I previously tried to respectfully explain to you that it is very irritating to many to keep hearing that the shares may be worthless.
Good for you. So, I'll respectfully note... You do realize you refer to JackJack's re-posting of a half-year old post, right? "Irritating" terms have NOT been used by me recently, only referred to in explanation because you asked, which continued this silly debate. Whatever.
This apparently is not about reality, is it?
You just posted the "w" "irritating" term, not once, but twice.
Difference between us is I'm Ok with you(all) posting your(their) thoughts.