Here it goes again. Has to always be about motive. Asking a real question that is important gets sidetracked under the guise of "trying to answer." Just more surmising about what JC thinks, and that JC is against this or that. This forum is not about JC, it is about this train-wreck known as Crystallex.

Where is the court order that says the moving parties must use an opt-in strategy over an opt-out strategy? Seriously.