"It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future." 

Yogi Berra 

Forecasting outcomes is not an exact science. We all know this fact all too well. People on Wall Street are paid millions to forecast where the stock indices will be at the end of the year, but very few hit the mark. And it is likely that some of the few that do hit the mark do it by mere happenstance. In all cases, those that attempt to forecast the future do it based on potential macroeconomic, geopolitical, and even weather scenarios. Some of these forecasters use models and "what-if?" algorithms developed by the brightest of the brightest that run on supercomputers. But, as people in the IT area often say, "garbage in, garbage out".

The distinct traits that aid the successful forecasters are thorough knowledge of the underlying facts and the most likely scenarios that can play out. Without this, a forecast is at best an educated guess.

I am on Prozone’s camp with a potential share value range, with both ends of the range modulated by each scenario, because it considers that there is more than one possible scenario for how the KRY saga will end.