Hello, Glorieux:

I read your decision in regard of Cedroc, and thank you for you kind and friendly comments.

Be it as you say: “So, Cedroc remains banned unless Agoracom themselves re-instate him.”

While disagree, I have had my say in the matter and my views remain unchanged for the reasons clearly (I hope) stated in my two postings.

Having said so, I agree to close this topic for public discussion. I am not a crusader, and apparently Cedroc has an avenue left open to defend himself and challenge your decision should he so desire. I don’t know Cedroc, but for sake of this forum I sincerely hope that he will do so.

In this Cedroc incident you wore a new and different hat, that of an administrator of Agora’s 6 Rules. In this conflict of opinions you were my opponent, not my enemy. Mark Twain said that differences of opinions make fine horse races. (Or short-sellers). Nothing that transpired between us lessened my esteem for you.

An important note:

In due course I shall write to Larry Hoover to thank him for his comments of

“…in response to Banning and Censorship on this Forum… by durban1

Posted on Nov 06, 10 02:00PM …”

I also will make some comments in regards to AGORACOM’s 6 Rules, and their administration, and ask some questions if and how the things could be improved in view of recent experience. Inevitably your and Cedroc’s name will come up along with some details of his story. You and fellow posters should rest assured, that the focus of the discussion will the 6 Rules, and it must not be seen as an attempt on my part to resume the conflict via new means.

My reply to Lar will be out of squence, because I was waiting the final outcome. I also better brush up on the 6 Rules before I sit down to the keyboard.

And now back to do what we all are here for: Chasing the fast buck!

Best regards,

durban1