Is it possible that some larger shareholders can get a different offer to vote with the merger the rest of us ? Maybe a side offer? I don't think it would be legal. What is Peggy Kent doing with her 12,000,000 + shares? Why hasn't she spoke up about it? Why have others decided not to contribute in the discussions any longer until after the merger? Sometimes I smell a set up.

---------------

I've thought about this too, but then how does the company cover this up? The extra payout to a bunch of shareholders would have to be accounted for in the financial statements, just like when Peggy got her extra payout last summer.

On the other hand they could sweeten the deal for certain shareholders with warrants in the new company?? Maybe?... I don't know of anyone who would consider even *more* WTG paper though...

I wonder if Fair For All is representing PK's shares?