<!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt; font-family:Tahoma } -->Well to make a long story short, it is an interesting exploration play. The assay results are interesting although low and over very narrow widths. I would watch it and see if anything better gets reported. For example at the mine I am presently trying to get operational, we are mining Ni in the range of 1.2 to 1.8% over widths of 20 metres and are nip and tuck with positive cash flow. Hell I could report 22% Ni over 1 meter widths, so 3.52% over 0.9 meter that Fancamp reports is interesting but a long way from being great news. Also, watch out for their next step which will be trying to use the same results and report it all as Ni equivelants or gold equivelants. This is a practice that exploration companies have used to get more financing. On paper it looks good (take all of your metals and convert the potential revenue to a single commoditiy) however when you start determining risk it is hard enough to predict what one metal might do over 10 years let alone 3 or 4. Then if you need the income from all 4 metals to make the mine work you will soon be up the creek without a paddle.