alright. Enough tomfoolery. As I said, I can't post as much as I normally do. We all have Agenda to encorage management to get SP up there so were less vulnerable. If u do jab Smith, just back it with a phone calls, which I know you do. And please don't change the forum into a conspiracy forum. We are all displeased about Smith's choices, but there are choices being made by Smith, Granger, and large shareholders that ultimately is unlocking our property value. Our SP is up and I expect to continue. Rose I expect you and Fani to maintain encouragement with the large shareholders to keep Smith focused on Magpie and Lac Lamalee, with no more dillution, and pressure to retract Desolation Lake expenditure. Others will create balance with the positive moves made on those two properties. I don't see duplicity in encouraging both sides, as long as negative and postive posts are backed with something proactive like a phone call to management, a large shareholder, a useful ice-breaking call to other entities that FNC managemnt may find useful. For example, aren't we all curious if Lac Lamalee will be drilled. Is it silliness to expect cost savings by sharing a camp with CHM, due to the competitive nature of mining? Perhaps, yet perhaps not. Certainly Smith may be reluctant to ask. However a pesky shareholder could easily. -sg