regarding independent evaluations

Highly prospective exploration company

Resource projects cover more than 1,713 km2 in three provinces at various stages, including the following: hematite magnetite iron formations, titaniferous magnetite & hematite, nickel/copper/PGM, chromite, Volcanogenic Massive and gold.

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

stock greed

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 7947 [?]

Votes: 218 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

regarding independent evaluations

in response to

Re: My Two Cents

rago1

posted on Mar 18, 2011 03:12AM

What would be an institution's advantage in investing in FNC.V as opposed to investing directly into the Magpie IPO?

Are institutions considering these two choices?

1) If one were mostly interested in the Magpie IPO, due to the property or the new CEO, then it would be more advantageous to subscribe to the Magpie IPO.

2) Institutions go with FNC for it's Fermont, and view Magpie and Lac Lamalee spin off as a bonus.

I'm curious what numbers are crunched by institutions to make their decision. Hopefully, following the PP close, they'll make it known.

I understand there are greater Canadian tax advantages to investing in flow throughs then private placements. Are there incentives to investing in an IPO?