Hello Eudaimonia,

You’ve just said:

“i would like much more transparency on some of the “going on’s”,
especially with the sheridan - smith connection, which i do not like at all.”

I appreciate your being candid and uninhibited, even in this public forum.
Possibly, this was a little careless verbiage on your part. However, it’s not
perfectly OK to make nasty insinuations without citing any evidence behind
your suspicions.

Certainly, it is OK to have concerns and to raise those concerns or questions.
However, it will serve you better to open the subject for discussion first, without
expressing beforehand your unsubstantiated hints that the CEO has engaged in
some kind of undefined improper conduct.

Don’t take this the wrong way; I appreciate a good no-holds-barred discussion.
But when it comes to someone’s professional reputation, it’s also good to exhibit
a little self-restraint.