It's just semantics Teleprobe. I think you failed to see my point and fixated on my poor choice of an adjective. I do understand the actual value of the transaction, but point is simply this: why sell shares at 0.065 when you know the company will pay 0.07.

To me that just seems to defy logic much like using pie in the sky figures you come up that never translate into actual share value, with all due respect! You do know the market does not value any of Fancamp's assests and they haven't for quite some time!! That's been precisely my frustration. I stand and would love to be proved wrong, but I'm still waiting...

Anyways, if you want to chime in on the movitivation of selling at 0.065 vs. 0.07, i would actually be interested to hear that because I think that is a peculiar issue here. But thanks for the arithmetic lesson on the 100G that's up for sale.

Eudai