So what I am inferring from the above is that if this Halt is due to any sort of transaction between SCZ and FNC,  then if it that arrangement  is equally accretive to both companies (and the MCAP of each company rises by the same amount ) then Mr Mehra would potentially personally  benefit 10 times more from the his share position in SCZ  given that the  his holdings of SCZ  are ~10+ times his share percentage of FNC). THAT  would be an unequivocally  clear conflict of interest  and I cannot see how that would ever be kosher. Seems logical then that any arrangement would have to benefit FNC to a much greater extent than SCN...

PLease correct me if I amy reading the situation incorrectly!