I wish we were presented with a better option

On one hand, Peter has allowed the company to be contaminated with questionable characters that have cost shareholders in the millions.  Also, his timing on share sales (CIA and SX in particular) was poorly executed.

On the other hand, despite having numerous properties, this new slate of directors have chosen to add a twice failed property to the mix and go all in, while causing massive dilution to existing shareholders.

In the end, I felt compelled to vote for the best of two poor choices.

Perhaps, they could use this extra time to come up with a better third option?