Still dazed from a 4 dayer in Vegas and getting home at 3am today.

Great results. Could be better, should be better and will be better!

Take note that I think these results are only from T1. There are still samples to come in from the T2 zone.

If you look at the geochem map you will see that the majority of these samples are from trenches that actually miss the favourable or 'good' zones as defined by the geochem survey. Of course, here's the silver (or golden) lining for you....the areas that lie within the 'good' zones have incredible results. There is an abundance of 'good zones' to be explored. Like, tip of the iceberg abundance.

Call me crazy or whatever you like, but the T2 samples that are yet to come in might be more indicative of what this area is all about. Those trenches are right on top of 'good' geochem surveys results.

IMO opinion, the real story is in the geochem surveys and this NR just proves to me, in fact, that it works....big time.

If they were to cut out the portion of these bulk samples that do not lie on favourable ground as per the geochem, the results would be even more incredible than they already are.

And if this is telling of what lies beneath the 'good' geochem results, tonnage won't be an issue.

Just a perspective and a theory but I'll hopefully get some clarification on this so don't hold me to it just yet!

And we're off.....

B