Well Brad, from what I understand from Prof Hoov, you have just perfectly described a Shear Hosted Zone. This was the original thinking of this area. However, the latest round of thinking is that this was NOT a Shear Hosted Zone. A SHZ would mean our deposit would have very set boundries based on the 2 rock formations-The gold would be contained within the fracture that lies between these bodies.

Our deposit so far has no set boundries. Moreover, the rock formation that we are bringing up is not identifying any shear zone of significance. This is very good news for us. A SHZ limits the deposit size. The type of geological event that created our deposit was secondary to a Hydrothermal event where the liquid was so hot and so pressurized, it pushed/pulverized it's way thru anything/everything in its path.

This is very significant as this type of geological event carries massive amounts of liquid and it gets deposited over kms in distance. This type of geological event requires some 2000m of thickness, probably more. So when JT says we can mine this profitably to 1000m when we have only drilled 400 meters deep, it is because he knows that geologically, this could not have been formed by a system that only has 400m in thickness. There is a geological reason to believe that our host rock will extend way past the 1000m that JT believes our deposit will be economical to mine.

Again...just sitting tight while the rest of the market tries to play catch up-don't you guys just love being so far ahead of the market?

I have heard a few of you mention thanks to myself, Brad and Hoov especially. However, I am not sure how many here realize who discovered this play. It is a poster with the handle Rago1 and I would personally like to thank him publicly.

Mr Rago1, you are without a doubt, one of the greatest gold diggers-Thank you for sharing this great company with us!

Glorieux