lar, do you know if gnh/reporting company will be applying a cut grade to the averages?

the reason i ask is it seems like the deposit itself has huge variances from one core to the next...i.e. visible gold in one core and low grade in the next....

i was under the impression that in the past some samples were excluded as anomolies because the grade was too high and looked erroneous, but it seems to me that with this deposit every core should be taken at face value....

the visible gold thing really has me excited. one core with 100g/ton makes up for a lot of cores with 1g/ton...at least that's my laymans way of thinking...

that, and i like pretty pictures of gold...