Hi CG,

Yes, I agree the published report may have raised expectations, but as you point out the author was careful to use the words "has the potential to" which, in my opinion, is the same as saying "do your own dd". The 6-9 month timeframe (for me) started when the company first started discussing the 100 MT target which was Late Spring/Early Summer 2010. I assume that Larry was using the same timeframe in his predictions as well, although I personally was allowing until March to reach that target as I wanted to see results the deep drilling holes before I moved up my timelines.

Here's hoping that this discussion will not need re-hashing at year's end but I will still be here and will be happy to oblige.

Best regards,

Scott