correct me if i'm wrong but i'm amazed these guys were able to get a 43-101 this quickly....a few months ago the argument was that this would take much more time and cost much more than it has. i might add that many on this board argued (correctly imo) that the in situ value of gold in the ground would be substantially discounted until the resources were 43-101 compliant.......a 43-101 is evidently the "benchmark" sasha was talking about...

unless i'm missing something page 55 (conclusions) states that bulk sampling suggests 3gr per ton....when tilsley/hoov/glori/etc were saying that, it was one thing, but when a 43-101 says it then it becomes a mining standard...

either i'm getting my panties in a bunch over nothing, or we just jumped to the next level...i hope you guys have your positions in place