matt, i agree with the "pumping" premise, it's part of what drives the price up in all publicly traded companies. there seems to be a consensus here that the PPS action we've seen in the past year was a bad thing because of the volatility...however, we went from a dime to a buck and seem to have settled on .50..(raising the shareprice 5-10x in a year is a good thing imo) . if the company can repeat this for another year i doubt the folks that bought at a buck will complain much...i would rather see any "pump" included in an nr that has some meat to it though. otherwise the affect would be minimal imo.

put some "pump" on the back of something substantial when possible.

i.e.- "highlights to this round of assays are hole #xxx which shows 7gr/ton over 24 meters and initial bulk sampling results from the snow white zone are showing XXX...(now include the pump part with something like)...these results are quickly taking the company to its stated goal of proving up 100MT and have caused management to reassess mid-term goals to the upside. at this time GNH believes that the potential for XXXMT may exist..the potential for a deposit of this size is extremely bla blah blah."