Hey CJR - I wonder if you may be right there. The way I understand it - the total pulp metallic assays are ordered based on any fire assay results that are above anomalous levels. My thinking is that there are actually a large number of total pulp metallic assays/hole and many of these would likely fall within acceptable limits (0.1g/t-10g/t for example) so there is no need for re-assay by total pulp metallic. However, maybe there are some short intervals with gangbuster grades that need to be re-assayed and this adds another (third) round of waiting for assays to the process. I'm spitballing here so please realize this is all in my opinion only.

Best,

Scott