i've sent an email to sasha asking for some clarification on the number of drill holes and "mineralization" questions.

from what i see, of the 37 holes left to report we can expect:

27 of the 37 holes had confirmed mineralization...17 at snow white, 10 elsewhere, 10 did'nt have confirmed mineralization (3 of which were at snow white)..

10 holes at snow white had VG, considering we already have 6 reported with VG there is no other VG...

i still have to find out if "confirmed mineralization" means much prior to assays but right now I'll go out on a limb and predict that snow white will show the best results to to date anywhere in our claim block and lavals mountain may show much less.

if snow white proves to be much higher grade does it matter if lavals proves to be barren or very low grade...?? i will say that if lavals does'nt show anything it might hurt the SGH credibility. any thoughts?