i dont remember calling you a basher? you are, but i dont remember calling you one..your posts are nothing but negative insinuation and inuendo....since you "insinuate" that i'm a "pumper" and say that i only see "positive" in GNH let me lay out some facts for you...

first, this is MY agenda.....yes, i'm positive on GNH but i would NOT compare it to barrick gold and i do not say that an explorer on the venture exchange does not come with risk. yes, some folks got burned because they bought at the peak before initial assay results came out. personally, i rode the stock until assays came out and then immediately sold because i believed the PPS was overvalued based on initial results...i then doubled my position and bought on the drop from .55 - .39.....i now own twice as much for the same initial investment (plus a little beer money) and now believe the PPS is undervalued but assays and more importantly bulk sampling will be the proof in the pudding....

what's YOUR agenda? if you are not forthright in your answer this WILL be the last time i respond to you. please respond with facts, not speculation.

facts:

- GNH's PPS IS TWICE WHAT IT WAS A YEAR AGO AND MORE THAN 5X WHAT IT WAS 2 YEARS AGO..i'll take that all day long, while your major claim is that share price has been eroded....

- GNH claims are located in one of the best districts for mining in the world

- GNH is showing mineralization over a large area, while finding capitalization to develop a resource and remaining pretty debt free with minimal dilution.

- GNH owns a buttload of land and claims

- GNH has assembled a very "distinguished" board and team in a very short period of time.