What I just said was misleading in one very important respect.
I wrote, “The emphasis is on the overall bulk sample average.”

Following that, I quoted from the “Investment Highlights” the statement:
“2010/11 bulk samples suggest an average grade of approximately 3g/t (0.088oz/t) Au.”

Apparently, that statement is not talking about the bulk samples themselves being 3g/t.
It is saying the bulk samples have led GNH to believe the overall resource is 3g/t.

Of course, if the 43-101RE agrees with the bulk samples 3g/t “suggestion,” many writers to this
Message Hub (including me) will discover their educated guesses were not well-educated after all.