"I am a bit confused by your statement above. The bulk of the drill results for T1/T2 and 88 have already been reported. These results are the ones that will have a potential impact on the resource estimate. There may be a couple of holes at Beland and elsewhere that are missing but I am missing the point of your message. The RE is being compiled as we speak and the timeline for completion is not under the control of GNH's maneagement - that's the Catch22 of third party involvement. What do you want GNH to say to its shareholders? "We have put out all of our results on T1/2 and are now waiting for SGS to finish the report" I thought that was fairly obvious."

My point is to state that, in addition to market conditions, GNH was not able to put out news to sustain interest within the timeline originally published by them, regardless of who set the date. This is not an unusual or totally unexpected occurrence but the effects are the same none the less on less impatient investors who ultimately have an affect on the sp as they exit. Some would say the sp is of no consequence in the short term but I would beg to differ when an SP take off from a higher starting point would be more beneficial. As for your last comment.....that actually wouldn't be a bad idea as the obvious becomes somewhat foggy as time wears on, particularly to those who perhaps are not as in touch and who play by numbers.....numbers like declining sp's. I suspect that GNH is doing what they see as appropriate.... I hope it suits us in the end. The aforementioned is just my opinion. I don't see it as a complaint as much as an observation.