Mr. Takefman,

I have no use for your phone number feel free to display your concern for "share holder interests" here for everyone to see for the concern you have for us is overwhelming.

It is plainly obvious that most everyone here is fully aware of the "lawsuit" you have filed to GNH. After all you are distributing this lawsuit yourself, just request a copy. I'm sure you have multiple versions at your disposal from previous frivolous lawsuits. I digress.

This behavior by Mr.takefman is lernaen at best, each head expressing self serving differences to what he say's versus what he actually does. He has continuously tried to spearhead his own version of a shareholder democracy, when at the very same time his legal proposals were riddled with confusion and errors. It was Earl whom requested to stand "election" as director of which the company agreed. This is nothing more than takefman's own kangaroo court where shareholders continue to endure his perversions and prevent a fully qualified board from directing this company.

What earl takefman sought from the court: "ORDER the Defendants to appoint Plaintiff to the Board of Directors in place of or in addition to those voted by shareholders"

Query; Does this sound as if he is accepting of a shareholder vote for or against his candidacy? Is this democratic?

The other head, continues to declare and post here that he is suing on behalf of shareholders. A saviour he is not, we are not interested and can no longer afford his price of veneration,nor is it in the best interest of this company.

What earl takefman in actuality carries out?

Seeks from the court: "Order the Defendents to pay solidarily to Earl Takefman damages in excess of $50,000,the exact amount of which will be proven at trial,with interest at the legal rate(s) plus additional indemnity provided by law,to accrue from the date of service of the present motion to institute proceedings;

"ORDER the Defendants to pay punitive damages of $10,000 with interest at the legal rate plus additional indemnity provided by law, to accrue from the date of service of the present Motion to Institute the proceedings, all with costs.

It is unimaginable that this man has requested more in damages than sasha's annual salary?

It's clear the grey matter from this persons mind has been long evacuated. GNH is not a lottery in which takefman controls the outcome every time let us put an end to this utter nonsense. If he were able to "win" in the best interests of the shareholders, will he provide for dividends to the shareholders from the pockets of Earl and Mona Lee Takefman corp?

Lastly,takefman has recently posted he wants the company to revise the information circular, and proxy materials for the AGM to sut his ideal "image making" and window dressing in the interest of the shareholders all at our cost! the shareholders? takefman is already in the business of litigation incur these costs yourself. Sell your tawdry ego elsewhere.

My work is done here.