Dear Bernard,

Great last video. 

Especially hearing about the initial skepticism of your technical team (is it a magic trick?) followed by their scientific approach to investigate the proces seriously, gives me (extra) reassurance on how you and HPQ are handeling the validation.

Great to hear the important steps of validation which already have been taken.

Great to hear about the expected new timeline. 

Concerning the EBH2 technology I have the following questions:

• Is it correct to assume that the EBH2 system needs to reach a system conversion efficiency (Ratio of Energy Produced to the Energy Consumed) of over 100% to live up to the claim of EBH2 that it’s a self sustaining system?
• The video on the EBH2 website claims that the system uses water as the main source of energy. This means that there is another minor source of energy. Do you and your technical team know what this minor source of energy is? Can you reveal it? (probably not) A rare metal? Is the minor source of energy readily available, or can supply issues be a limiting factor in the future production of EBH2 systems?
• EBH2 claims that the system works on virtually any source of water including salt water. Is your technical team going to bring their own water to the second validation? We wouldn’t want them testing the system on something like heavy water (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_water)

Thanks, 

And keep up the great work.

The SP will follow in the end (just my expectation and personal opinion)

Thanks 

Commensense