EBF,

I am aware they were new hole(s). What I was trying to determine was, if these two new holes were in a new area that had no prior drilling. That doesn’t seem to be the case now as I had first thought. By the maps and Technical Reports I put forward for your reference, and by your recent thoughts/opinion on what ISM has mentioned, it does seem like prior drilling has occurred directly above these two new holes. One would then have to take it as meaning the Resources mentioned in the Micon 43-101 include all of these old holes above these two new ones. Knowing that, it will make it a little easier in figuring out what the additional tonnage and grade might bring to the overall L-1 Resource after further drilling is done without any overlap.

Thanks

Nickel77