b-lunist.
i stated what i thought about his post. but his respones
to be may have been sincere but i do not appreciate the LOL dude stuff. i am entitled to my opinion as you.
saying i found him obnoxious in his response is
my perogative, not yours. i have no axe with sge.
i have a problem with not being allowed to voice an
opinion without responses from posters like yourself.
this board was one to share ideas (good or bad). now you
post a concern and the thought police want you banned or
you are a basher.
i invested when woody was still ceo.
my concerns are valid, at least for me. i have watched
PTSC accomplish nothing over the years despite valid
technologies. now we merged the portfolio with the folks
we were in court with. PTSC, IMO, has no control, in
anything and it bothers me that TPL has changed directions
with respect to the system licenses and royalties. Again,
my money, my perogative to voice my concern. if sge or
others have countering points of view, i am okay with that.
but the tone of response is not to engage in debate but
to ``one up`` the poster.
Can i ask the question as to why we did not put the
dividend money up to further develop the ignite or
wireless charging. my money, and it bothers me that are
vision of the future is presently a ``wait and see``.
sorry but it bothers me.
to end, where did i say he was not a fair poster.
i disagree with him and the tone of his response.
thats all.
have any kind of day that spins your boat.
sincerely,
t`moto