i stated what i thought about his post. but his respones

to be may have been sincere but i do not appreciate the LOL dude stuff. i am entitled to my opinion as you.

saying i found him obnoxious in his response is

my perogative, not yours. i have no axe with sge.

i have a problem with not being allowed to voice an

opinion without responses from posters like yourself.

this board was one to share ideas (good or bad). now you

post a concern and the thought police want you banned or

you are a basher.

i invested when woody was still ceo.

my concerns are valid, at least for me. i have watched

PTSC accomplish nothing over the years despite valid

technologies. now we merged the portfolio with the folks

we were in court with. PTSC, IMO, has no control, in

anything and it bothers me that TPL has changed directions

with respect to the system licenses and royalties. Again,

my money, my perogative to voice my concern. if sge or

others have countering points of view, i am okay with that.

but the tone of response is not to engage in debate but

to ``one up`` the poster.

Can i ask the question as to why we did not put the

dividend money up to further develop the ignite or

wireless charging. my money, and it bothers me that are

vision of the future is presently a ``wait and see``.

sorry but it bothers me.

to end, where did i say he was not a fair poster.

i disagree with him and the tone of his response.

thats all.

have any kind of day that spins your boat.

sincerely,

t`moto