I said anyone that would invest in a company, and stay invested, even though they thought management was incompetent and untrustworthy, was a moron. I stand by that statement. If those criteria fit any posters here, then that's my opinion of them. I think most would agree with that assessment.

I won't even belabor the fact that I brought up last night, which is, it's not going to change. If you believe Swartz is in control and that Pohl is Swartz' puppet, please enlighten me as to how that will ever change.

As others have pointed out this morning which I also should have addressed last night is the fact that all these management bashers seem to think they can judge the decisions being made based on their limited knowledge of the total situation. The worst kind of decision is an uninformed one. Who has more info, Pohl or the posters? Dot says the Holocom deal was bogus and a mistake. Sorry, but I missed the post where he posted his in-depth research on the Holocom technology and his assessment thereof. I missed the post where he listed all the other better candidates and his reasons why they were better candidates. I missed his in-depth analysis of how much money it will take to come up with a jv/acquisition that will generate decent, reliable income for the foreseeable future. For some reason he's holding all that info back from us.