I think this is good for the whole case. It seems the J2.5 were being completely unreasonable about the expanded(more accurate PIC's) With out reviewing the Dec. filing we won't know what PTSC gave up, if anything. I seem to remember the J2.5 claiming we added a few processors to our original list?? Also, if I am correct we are now talking about hundreds if not thousands of processor appications infringing. Moving right along....

" the plaintiffs have agreed to amend their proposed Amended Preliminary Infringement Contentions to correspond to the claim charts provided to the defendants in December 2006"