<TPL and ARM are working on a stipulated judgement of non-infringement, according to a footnote in the motion to continue.>
Sure would be nice to have the exact wording, since the above makes no sense to me. Why would TPL be working on a stipulated judgement of NON-infringement? I do not think one was issued, so how could TPL be working on it? Perhaps the exact wording may clarify what TPL is working on. TIA Opty