What a difference a day makes.
posted on
Oct 30, 2007 02:33PM
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
Technology Properties Limited and Patriot
Scientific Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.;
Panasonic Corporation of North America; JVC
Americas Corp.; NEC Electronics America,
Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America,
Inc.; Toshiba America Electronic Components,
Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems,
Inc.; Toshiba America Consumer Products,
LLC; ARM, Inc.; and ARM, Ltd.
Defendants.
JURY DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET
CONTROL ORDER WITH RESPECT TO DEADLINES FOR EXPERT REPORTS
COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendants (“Parties”) seeking the Court’s
extension of the deadlines for: 1) designate expert witnesses for parties with burden of proof
other than claim construction, and 2) serve expert witness reports. The Parties request that these
deadlines be extended by one day, from October 29, 2007 to October 30, 2007.
This extension is not being sought for the purpose of delay.
Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to this motion.
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully pray that the Court grant this Motion and
permit the above extension.
2
DATED: October 29, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00494 (TJW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
Technology Properties Limited and Patriot
Scientific Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd.,
Panasonic Corporation of North America, JVC
Americas Corporation, NEC Electronics
America, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc., Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc. and Toshiba America
Consumer Products, LLD,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:05-CV-00494 (TJW)
JURY DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO STAY
- 1 -
CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00494 (TJW)
COME NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendants ("Parties"), requesting this Court to stay the
present action for thirty days.
This stay is not being sought for the purpose of delay.
Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to this motion.
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully pray that the Court grant this Motion and permit
the above stay.
DATED: October 30, 2007 By: /s/ Roger L. Cook
Also, the requested recaption is being used in the filings despite the motion to revert to the prior caption.
Be well