Brush up on the recent ruling with AAPL vs. BRST and tell me if a Markman ruling gives any advantages...

The recent ruling (a few weeks back) was based on a SJ request by AAPL - That one was a travesty won by AAPL by pure guile, misinformation, information overload and fact-shifting to the judge...end result, She disallowed on 1/3 of the major patents AAPL was attacking.

BTW, BRST won the Markman with this judge, and to all following, (Before the SJ) deemed the case a "slam-dunk" in BRST favor...

BRST walked away with a $10M settlement w/AAPL...and also with a very uncertain future.

Incredible story, but true - See any possible parallels here?

(Moral - Don't let this case go to trial or SJ...end it asap. )

Regards