Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Re:PTSC buyout - BillW
4
Jan 11, 2008 01:04PM
18
Jan 11, 2008 01:24PM
16
Jan 11, 2008 02:15PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 02:26PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 02:28PM

Jan 11, 2008 02:38PM
8
Jan 11, 2008 03:01PM

Jan 11, 2008 03:49PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 04:26PM

Jan 11, 2008 05:08PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 05:29PM

Jan 11, 2008 07:06PM
13
Jan 11, 2008 07:26PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 10:26PM
6
Jan 12, 2008 04:10AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 04:23AM

Jan 12, 2008 04:23AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 04:47AM

Jan 12, 2008 04:48AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 04:56AM
8
Jan 12, 2008 04:57AM

Jan 12, 2008 05:06AM
8
Jan 12, 2008 05:13AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 05:25AM
3
Jan 12, 2008 05:42AM
4
Jan 12, 2008 06:10AM

Jan 12, 2008 06:21AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 06:35AM

Jan 12, 2008 07:33AM
4
Jan 12, 2008 07:41AM

Jan 12, 2008 07:55AM
5
Jan 12, 2008 09:05AM
6
Jan 12, 2008 09:31AM

While it is cerrtainly possible that there is some sort of buyout scenario out there, I really doubt that our seemingly held down PPS is a real clue.

Now, I say it's possible, and I agree that any such move would have to envolve TPL, but necessarily in the capacity some depict. They don't have to be the buyer, and IMO probably wouldn't/couldn't. But the Master Agreement (MA) provisions could be modified to the parties' mutual wishes at any time. If the proposed buyer offers something that TPL wants, and if PTSC wanted to "let go", it could happen. For TPL, the benefit could be some consideration$ for releasing PTSC from the MA, and maybe a more desireable "partner" in the licensing and maybe even other enterprize.

Having said that, please consider what TPL would be giving up if another (presumeably powerful) entity took over PTSC. CONTROL. First, do ya think some megabuck company (which it would almost have to be) would agree to relinquish virtually all control to TPL? Do you think TPL would be interested in relinquishing its control of the licensing effort? I find an answer "yes" to either of these questions a bit difficult to achieve.

As for the down right depressing PPS, I still believe it has to do with two things: perceived risk and Swartz - the two primary influences all along. I saw nothing in the 10Q about Swartz's current holdings. But we know he/S&L have sold in the past, and may be still. Some may yell "warrants", but unless they were about to expire, they were as good as shares. So, IMO, alot of what we continue to experience is a continuing theme of Swartz dumping - which I find very disappointing - but ultimately understandable and desireable for longs.

I do not really get why there continues to apparently be so much perceived risk. We've overcome every hurdle that has come along, or continue to be in the midst of the fight (USPTO). And we've got a long list of impressive licensees, a lot of money in the bank, and capable people seeking out acquisitions. But what is the real risk, especially short term? I honestly don't see it.

It's probably because I KNOW nuttin'!

SGE

3
Jan 12, 2008 11:54AM

Jan 12, 2008 11:54AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 12:35PM
2
Jan 12, 2008 12:48PM
10
Jan 12, 2008 01:04PM

Jan 12, 2008 01:11PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 01:20PM
6
Jan 12, 2008 01:28PM
8
Jan 12, 2008 01:29PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 01:39PM

Jan 12, 2008 04:41PM
20
Jan 12, 2008 05:27PM

Jan 12, 2008 06:44PM

Jan 12, 2008 06:54PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 07:31PM
8
Jan 12, 2008 07:53PM
7
Jan 13, 2008 05:45AM
7
Jan 13, 2008 07:19AM
6
Jan 13, 2008 05:29PM

Jan 13, 2008 06:26PM
1
Jan 13, 2008 06:45PM
15
Jan 13, 2008 06:59PM
10
Jan 13, 2008 08:59PM
9
Jan 13, 2008 11:10PM
2
Jan 14, 2008 03:16AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 03:43AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 03:56AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 04:03AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 04:05AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 04:17AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 04:34AM
2
Jan 14, 2008 04:45AM
4
Jan 14, 2008 05:04AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
14
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:47AM
6
Jan 14, 2008 05:50AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:59AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 06:02AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 06:58AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 07:08AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 07:15AM
6
Jan 14, 2008 07:19AM

Jan 14, 2008 07:25AM
13
Jan 14, 2008 07:45AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 07:54AM
2
Jan 14, 2008 07:57AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 08:24AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 08:29AM
20
Jan 14, 2008 08:34AM

Jan 14, 2008 08:38AM
4
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM

Jan 14, 2008 09:54AM

Jan 14, 2008 12:08PM
5
Jan 14, 2008 02:53PM

Jan 14, 2008 03:03PM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:53PM
2
Jan 14, 2008 07:01PM

Jan 15, 2008 04:37AM

Jan 15, 2008 05:05AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply