Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Re: SGE....thanks....Ron...
4
Jan 11, 2008 01:04PM
18
Jan 11, 2008 01:24PM
16
Jan 11, 2008 02:15PM
2
Jan 11, 2008 02:26PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 02:28PM

Jan 11, 2008 02:38PM
8
Jan 11, 2008 03:01PM

Jan 11, 2008 03:49PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 04:26PM

Jan 11, 2008 05:08PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 05:29PM

Jan 11, 2008 07:06PM
13
Jan 11, 2008 07:26PM
1
Jan 11, 2008 10:26PM
6
Jan 12, 2008 04:10AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 04:23AM

Jan 12, 2008 04:23AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 04:47AM

Jan 12, 2008 04:48AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 04:56AM
8
Jan 12, 2008 04:57AM

Jan 12, 2008 05:06AM
8
Jan 12, 2008 05:13AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 05:25AM
3
Jan 12, 2008 05:42AM
4
Jan 12, 2008 06:10AM

Jan 12, 2008 06:21AM
2
Jan 12, 2008 06:35AM

Jan 12, 2008 07:33AM
4
Jan 12, 2008 07:41AM

Jan 12, 2008 07:55AM
5
Jan 12, 2008 09:05AM
6
Jan 12, 2008 09:31AM
8
Jan 12, 2008 11:26AM
3
Jan 12, 2008 11:54AM

Jan 12, 2008 11:54AM
1
Jan 12, 2008 12:35PM
2
Jan 12, 2008 12:48PM
10
Jan 12, 2008 01:04PM

Jan 12, 2008 01:11PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 01:20PM
6
Jan 12, 2008 01:28PM
8
Jan 12, 2008 01:29PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 01:39PM

Jan 12, 2008 04:41PM
20
Jan 12, 2008 05:27PM

Jan 12, 2008 06:44PM

Jan 12, 2008 06:54PM
1
Jan 12, 2008 07:31PM
8
Jan 12, 2008 07:53PM

Thank you for your civil response to all that.  After having "slept on it", I came to the conclusion that your thoughts may have been "this guy's an idiot - he acknowledges ignorance and says he'll listen, but he still isn't hearing me as revealed by his largely unchanged position".

On top of this, there is the settlement value thing, which I suspect has to do with the fundamental question in your mind - "at what point are we a winner?".

So I'm providing the following to hopefully disspell the first thought and to clarify why I still regard us an absolute winner in TX.

The licenses in TX were not a "one time" event.  IMO, as long as we came out with at least one patent intact and in an "up" position monetarily out of TX - no matter how small - we won.  Why?  Because there are 450+ more infringers out there!  As long as there is a net $ gain, and the game is still on, we haven't "lost" anything of consequence in the overall scheme of things.

So, with my mindset, the ONLY way we lose is if in one of our "entanglements" the result is that all the patents are rendered invalid.  We obviously survived the TX entanglement with the patents intact - the Js licensed all of them.  IMO, this is a solid win.  And even if we got less monetarily than my "so-so" threshold of $50M to PDS (market perception, or my $100M personal perception), I still don't believe I would consider it a "loss".  Again, the door remains open to 450+ more suspected infringers.  The only way we lose, IMO, is if that door gets slammed shut.

Our only other current "entanglement" is with the USPTO.  The ultimate results won't be known for a very long time, and recognizing "how that game is played", I believe we have a very good chance of prevailing.  Through in a bit of my ignorance (which does abound!), and I'd say we have an extremely good chance of prevailing.

Hopefully this amazingly short (LOL) clarification gives you a much better understanding of where I'm coming from, and perhaps some things to consider.  We shall see! (LOL)

Thank you again for your patience.

All JMHOs,

SGE

 

7
Jan 13, 2008 07:19AM
6
Jan 13, 2008 05:29PM

Jan 13, 2008 06:26PM
1
Jan 13, 2008 06:45PM
15
Jan 13, 2008 06:59PM
10
Jan 13, 2008 08:59PM
9
Jan 13, 2008 11:10PM
2
Jan 14, 2008 03:16AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 03:43AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 03:56AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 04:03AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 04:05AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 04:17AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 04:34AM
2
Jan 14, 2008 04:45AM
4
Jan 14, 2008 05:04AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
14
Jan 14, 2008 05:26AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:47AM
6
Jan 14, 2008 05:50AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:59AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 06:02AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 06:58AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 07:08AM
5
Jan 14, 2008 07:15AM
6
Jan 14, 2008 07:19AM

Jan 14, 2008 07:25AM
13
Jan 14, 2008 07:45AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 07:54AM
2
Jan 14, 2008 07:57AM
3
Jan 14, 2008 08:24AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 08:29AM
20
Jan 14, 2008 08:34AM

Jan 14, 2008 08:38AM
4
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM
1
Jan 14, 2008 09:22AM

Jan 14, 2008 09:54AM

Jan 14, 2008 12:08PM
5
Jan 14, 2008 02:53PM

Jan 14, 2008 03:03PM
1
Jan 14, 2008 05:53PM
2
Jan 14, 2008 07:01PM

Jan 15, 2008 04:37AM

Jan 15, 2008 05:05AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply