That darn MOU keeps bugging me. If the settlement is only money, whether lump sum or payments over a period of time, that would be the settlement agreement. What would the MOU do that the settlement agreement would not? Isn't an MOU kind of like a document spelling out what the parties would like to do, as opposed to must do? I'm thinking that a roughly sketched out business arrangement (JV) might be the cause for the MOU. But if it is not workable then the settlement falls back to a straight monetary payment scheme. Should that be the case, one would hope that PTSC would issue a statment in conjunction with the quarterly report explaining it. All IMHO Opty