BaNosser...reexams will give us a boost in price but without meaningful licensing with numbers attached or some explanation of possible future royalty payments then that boost in price will not hold IMO.

Likewise, another BOD member will not aid us at this time...at least PPS movement. Replacing one or more because of lack of performance or add some knowledge in a M&A field we need might help get us to the end goal of a good M&A. Even then the company said it would probably use an outside consultant to finalize anything in that arena. We do not need another person taking salary from the till to sit on a board to accomplish nothing at this time.

What we drastically need for this PPS to move is more information on the licenses. Not anything contrary to an NDA but info as to if there is ongoing payments, are they increasing and how are our rev's going to be affected by the seemingly large expenses we see with little in the way of NET Profit thus getting us to a higher PPS.

Now RG did say in his letter...

"In the longer term, I will strive to create a quarterly mechanism to provide more direct access to management (possibly a quarterly conference call) before the next shareholders meeting in October of this year. "

With all that is going on now, or NOT going on right now, IMO the word "possibly" just went away. RG IMo won't do an open conference call form the public, imagine the questions he'd be swamped with esp. those he would refuse to answer due to "privacy"

Until whomever is running the show here at PTSC...(and we still have no one that I know of running the show to protect the shareholders assets here....AKA...NO COB...) opens up and gives us some reasonable answers to our questions, IMO we are doomed to wallow in this PPS range for long time.