Not trying to be argumentative, but in this, there is no indication in what you posted that the actual license agreements were signed prior to the MOU being created. I admit that there is an agreement to dismiss, but that agreement could well BE the outlined in and be the MOU, and be one of the sealed documents referenced as Exhibits.

An order presented to the Court by ALL parties to the litigation as such states that ALL parties are in agreement to that order - there is no need for any further oversight, or come to that, an MOU. The Court oversight of the MOU, is in my very humble opinion, for something over and above settling the litigation. One doesn't retain oversight of something that has concluded.

Be well