You didn't. SGE1 DID. I was responding to you because your post to ease implied to me at least, that SGE1's theory was a simple harmless "what if", when in fact it totally, and BASELESSLY I might add, accuses them of those things. While it might seem harmless, it in essense propagates a perspective of JT, the BOD, and now of RG, that they are NOT doing even their most basic job as officers of the company, and I think that is completely false! I think there can be legitimate discussion about the wisdom of their decisions, but what SGE1 proposed goes way beyond that IMO, and that's why I posted so strongly in response to it, and why, IMO, he took such offense to it.